The exhibition is designed to create a field of aesthetic tension between the collections of the Museo de Arte Prehispanico Rufino Tamayo in Oaxaca and this museum of international art in Mexico City. The show includes pre-Hispanic, modern and contemporary works of art in order to contrast the different ways that the indigenous aesthetic and mainstream international canons have been assimilated.
In the year 2000, art historian Olivier Debroise curated
the show Tamayo en el torbellino de la modernidad,
while also calling into critical question the
underlying objectives of the creation of the Museo
Tamayo. Similar to the life story of the Oaxacan
artist, the roots of this institution lie in the polemic
between nationalistic muralism (whose maxim was
based on David Alfaro Siqueiros’ statement of 1944:
“There is no other route than ours”) and the
internationalist vision defended by Rufino Tamayo.
The Museo Tamayo has acted as a forum spotlighting
international contemporary art in Mexico, subsidized
by private initiative. Though distanced from the
hegemonic years of the Mexican School, the museum’s
mission came about as a consequence of modern
disputes between figuration, realism, abstraction,
muralism, easel painting and the aspiration toward
universal art.
There are Other Routes than Ours is designed to
create a field of aesthetic tension between the
collections of the Museo de Arte Prehispánico Rufino
Tamayo in Oaxaca and this museum of international
art in Mexico City. Not unlike the artistic conflicts
that breathed life into the Museo Tamayo, the show
includes pre-Hispanic, modern and contemporary works of
art in order to contrast the different ways that the indigenous
aesthetic and mainstream international canons (whether they
be from the modern age or from more recent expressions) have
been assimilated. To this end, the works and documents included
in this show evoke the “realism” of the Mexican Painting School,
to the extent that they contrast the nationalistic rhetoric with
the abstract languages of international art and the contemporary
strategies of the symbolic and critical appropriation of the
idealism of modernity.
The selection of works is based on their material pictorial qualities,
the ambivalent relationship among abstraction, pre-Columbian
figuration, artisanal techniques, as well as rural landscapes and
folk and media depictions of advertisements and urban signage.
Furthermore, the presence of Josep Grau-Garriga’s large-format
tapestry Henequén rojo y negro (1981) alongside Gabriel Orozco’s
Mural Sol (2000) and Teresa Margolles’ Muro Baleado (2009),
prompt us to think about other narratives that reflect the
cosmological and universal modernity of Tamayo’s contemporaries.
In general, the relationships among these works are not so much
historiographic as they are based on other aesthetic routes,
postures and models which confront each other at the same
time as they show, in the international languages of art, complex
“social realities.”
The works selected for this show include modern paintings as
well as some of the Museo Tamayo’s recent acquisitions of
contemporary art. The different approaches draw on the similarities
and differences among the pieces to raise the question of how
museums, their collections and art in general establish aesthetic
models to negotiate with reality. When shown in conjunction
with specific objects, the emphasis on textural aspects and symbols
—and the apparent contradiction between Bill Brandt’s realistic
photography and Siqueiros’ claim that there was “no other
route”—reveals contrasts between the aesthetic experience of
the works and the museum’s exterior “reality” which they frame.
The show highlights the play of forces between the museum’s
interior and exterior realities. In this manner, it questions
the ways in which museums approach and configure the real,
whether in the mythicizing subjection of modernity as compared
to archaic cultures, or in the different ways that contemporary
artworks insert aspects of reality into the museum. Among the
works and textures, figures, symbols and objects there are
interwoven experiences that bring reality closer and push it
away, that mythicize the past or repudiate folk and pre-Hispanic
world views.
After modernity, the museum became a setting for the combination
of universal images and the partial visions that could both sublimate
and demythologize art’s relationship with the world.
The modern paintings in the Museo Tamayo collection introduce
archaic values that reject academicist canons and rethink the
surface of the painting as a reality in and of itself. The textural,
material and artisanal qualities of the selected works propose
an aesthetic organization that strays from the naturalistic
representation of the real.
However, these new symbolic “realities” link the past to the present,
and configure a mythical vision of modernity. The reality of
archetypal textures and symbols implies the intuition of universality,
which was the aesthetic position that Tamayo advocated to
counter the realism of the Mexican Painting School.
For its part, contemporary art embeds reality within the museum
environment. Examples of this are the “bullet-ridden brick
wall” that looks like a minimalist sculpture, and a beer ad whose
stereotypical and touristic vision of Mexico may be equated to
the tradition of official muralism, by means of the comparison
between the evocative imaginary of the exported product and
the symbolic machinery of the post-revolutionary state.
Artisanal” reproduction techniques—such as Gabriel Orozco’s
enlargements of the Cerveza Sol label and the multiple copies
made by professional sign painters of paintings by Francis
Alÿs—rely on the reproduction of images to break with the
paradigm of originality and thus call into question the value of
the unique and unrepeatable artwork extolled by modernity.
Teresa Margolles’ sculpture of bricks pierced by a hail of bullets
literally brings into the museum a section of wall that shows
the reality of a society plagued by violence. In this context, such
works force us to rethink the moral and mythologized vision
of the artistic gesture as something that defended folk and non-
Western cultures during Tamayo’s modern period.
Furthermore, the “struggle” between interior and exterior
—symbolized by Carlos Amorales’ confrontation between his
self and his masked alter-ego, or Jonathan Monk’s work that
reverses and rotates the sign of the legendary Hotel Palenque—
results in obscure psychological worlds, or derelict, rural and
entropic worlds that invert the popular imaginary of the fantastic.
The modern aesthetic, which rejected Renaissance principles
of naturalistic representation, was also opposed to the realistic
conventions of muralism. Tamayo’s collection of easel paintings
asserted a new universal mystique between international art
and the different ways in which local or ancient cultures were
assimilated, while contemporary works reinforced a demythologized
and critical relationship with their own institutionalization.
As such, these practices called into question the contexts created
by collections and museums, in the sense that they are marks
of international visibility that channel the reception of our
social, political and cultural reality.
Eduardo Abaroa’s project, done ex profeso for this show, presents
a counterpoint to the institutional exploitation of pre-Hispanic
cultures, whether it takes the form of the official realism of muralism,
the anthropology museum, or the international museum as a link
between the past and the universal supposition of artistic values.
Both the cultural policies of post-revolutionary Mexico and
Rufino Tamayo’s concept of modernity found in art a successor
to Mesoamerican civilizations. This selection of pieces from the
collection of the Museo de Arte Prehispánico Rufino Tamayo
in Oaxaca casts doubt on the museum context and its strategies
of stabilization and inclusion of autochthonous cultures, which
stem from nationalistic policies that glorify the past rather than
drawing attention to their current social condition.
Communications
Sofía Provencio - Beatriz Cortés T. (5255) 5286 6519 prensa@museotamayo.org
Museo Tamayo Arte Contemporáneo
Paseo de la Reforma 51, Bosque de Chapultepec Del. Miguel Hidalgo C.P. 11580. México, D.F.
Hours:
Tuesday through Sunday, 10 am to 6 pm
Price: $19 / General public
Entrance is free to students, teachers, and senior citizens with valid identification
Sunday free to public