Centro Andaluz de Arte Contemporaneo
Philip Kwame Apagya
Nobuyoshi Araki
Diane Arbus
Richard Avedon
Tina Barney
Herbert Bayer
Aenne Biermann
Koos Breukel
Jo Ann Callis
Larry Clark
John Coplans
Gabriel Cuallado'
Philip-Lorca diCorcia
Rineke Dijkstra
William Eggleston
Walker Evans
Hans-Peter Feldmann
Thomas Florschuetz
Robert Frank
Lee Friedlander
Bernhard Fuchs
Cristina García Rodero
Andre' Gelpke
Nan Goldin
Pierre Gonnord
Axel Grunewald
Jitka Hanzlova'
Cristobal Hara
Florence Henri
Craigie Horsfield
Valerie Jouve
Judith Joy Ross
William Klein
Astrid Klein
Barbara Klemm
Josef Koudelka
Heinrich Kuhn
Vladimir Kupriyanov
Helmar Lerski
Danny Lyon
Esko Mannikko
Angus McBean
Susan Meiselas
Duane Michals
Boris Mikhailov
Laszlo' Moholy-Nagy
Helmut Newton
Ken Ohara
Martin Parr
Irving Penn
Anders Petersen
Bernhard Prinz
Arnulf Rainer
Timm Rautert
Eugene Richards
Heinrich Riebesehl
Humberto Rivas
Thomas Ruff
Inta Ruka
August Sander
Michael Schmidt
Thomas Schutte
Andres Serrano
Cindy Sherman
Otto Steinert
Joel Sternfeld
Paul Strand
Beat Streuli
Thomas Struth
Juergen Teller
Miguel Trillo
Hellen van Meene
Weegee
Edward Weston
Garry Winogrand
Stanislaw Ignacy Witkiewiczn
International Photography
This exhibition is organised by the CAAC in collaboration with the Folkwang Museum of Essen,
Picasso Museum Málaga and curated by Ute Eskildsen. An extensive catalogue of the exhibition
has been published including articles by renowned specialists.
Portraits can be considered as the
quintessential expression of human nature. It
is a photographic genre which functions on
the basis of a multiple dialogue between
photographer / model, photographer /
spectator and model / spectator. The
implications and consequences of these
complex relationships have been explored
since the very beginnings of photography,
giving rise to a set of practices and uses,
faces and bodies, which have gradually
shaped the genealogy of this genre. This
exhibition includes a selection of images
representing the history of portraiture in the
20th century. Thus, the first half of last
century saw the creation of the main
reference models, such as August Sander
and Walker Evans, and the first experiments
with avant-garde works.
Then, from the 1950s
onwards, the former tradition underwent a
continuous and unstoppable process of
exploration, review and reconsideration.
During the second half of the 20th century,
which is the main scope of this exhibition, the
portrait genre experienced profound
changes. The human presence, both as an
individual and as part of a group, became the
crux of creative strategies which attempted
to reflect on identity, individuality, social
groups, the public and the private, the body
and gender. During these years, the practice
of photography fused with the rest of artistic
disciplines and this led to a review of both
the historical and functional models of
photography and the contributions of the
avant-garde.
During the 1950s, portraiture tended to be
situated within the social liberal model of
documentary making. However, this model
started to enter a crisis in the United States
during the 1950s. Figures such as Robert
Frank, Garry Winogrand or Lee Friedlander
began to show that changes in the social
landscape, especially in urban areas, were
EXHIBITION
radically modifying the parameters of
construction and perception of the subject.
Meanwhile, Diane Arbus portrayed a gallery of
peculiar anti-heroes who were a long way from
the profuse exemplary and universal
characters featured in the documentaries
made during the previous decade. However,
parallel to this approach, several outstanding
photographers, such as Nan Goldin, Larry
Clark, Danny Lyon and Eugene Richards,
proposed a return to testimonial photography,
to specific contexts and, in a way, to the
marginal side. In a sense, there was a reaction
to the dissolution of the subject.
This interest in the specificity of contexts
which explain and determine the subject or
in well-defined and delimited human, social
and professional groups has become a
widely-disseminated model since the 1980s.
The works of Boris Mijailov, Tina Barney,
André Gelpke, Susan Meiselas, Martin Parr,
Esko Männikkö, Judith Joy-Ross, Miguel Trillo
or Cristina García Rodero, among others, are
good examples of this perception. In these
artists’ work, the subject is defined through
his or her belonging to a community or a
group or due to sharing some kind of
common experience.
The approach which has persisted in going
further into the dissolution of the subject,
and into the loss of its unity and singularity,
occupies a very different and contrasting
position. Artist photographers such as Beat
Streuli, Valérie Jouve or Philip Lorca diCorcia
show, in this sense, the immersion and
dissolution of the individual in an ever more
denaturalised urban setting.
Works dealing with gestures, attire or
references to a preferably pictorial classical
iconography become frequent from the
1980s onwards. These are works of a very
aesthetic appearance, both elegant and
beautiful, which use a historical reference as
the vehicle for a critical discourse. This is the case of Andrés Serrano, Bernhard Prinz and
Craigie Horsfield.
A more literal use of pictorial references
appears in the Dutch school, which has
tended to lean towards registering unstable
identities, with photographers such as Hellen
van Meene or Koos Breukel. Reference to
historical iconographic models also appears
in the work of Rineke Dijkstra. Her proposal,
which has successfully updated August
Sander’s model, reinstates the portrait as a
genre capable of transmitting the individual’s
subjectivity and even helping it to emerge.
The dialogue between identity and human
condition, between individual specificity and
universal values of existence, makes up part
of the genealogy of portraits. From Paul
Strand to Richard Avedon or, more recently,
Pierre Gonnord, there is an inevitable urge
which constantly reappears in portraiture: an
urge to achieve a corporal emancipation
capable of bringing to light what lies under
the skin.
But not all artists attribute the same
possibilities to the photographic portrait.
Thomas Ruff reduces and practically does
away with expressive profundity. In his
extensive Portraits series Ruff does not
restrict himself to raising the question of
identity, which he does by means of the
development of an anonymous individuality
turning out to be inaccessible due to its
incapacity to communicate, but he also
touches upon identification mechanisms with
the information contained in the pictures.
Meanwhile Thomas Struth, with his “family portraits”, constructs evidence about people
living in our time. Both Ruff and Struth offer a
diluted image of the subject or the family
model which is on the verge of disappearing.
The work of Cindy Sherman occupies an
important place in the process of
deconstruction and reconsideration of the
portrait as a valid model for representing
subjectivity and identity. This is especially
true of her series Untitled Film Stills, where
she suggests that the very condition of
identity is based on representation, on tales,
images, conventions and social types.
Sherman converts her body into the object
of multiple transformations, turning
simulacrum and allegory into tools of
unquestionable efficacy.
The work of photographers such as John
Coplans, Thomas Florschuetz, Astrid Klein,
Michael Schmidt and Hans-Peter Feldmann
continues to reflect on the loss of unity,
the absorption of the individual by the
social media scene, the fragmentation of
the body or the process of dispersion and
multiplication of images. Their work deals
with the current nature and economy of
the images, demonstrating the
conventions and systems which govern our
visual world.
In a way, this exhibition shows the
generalised dialectic between those works
which seek singularity or a sensation of
social and territorial context, and those
others which move within abstract
universalisation and criticism of the system
of symbols and representation.
Centro Andaluz de Arte Contemporaneo
Monasterio de la Cartuja de Santa Maria de Las Cuevas, Avda. Americo Vespucio 2 - Sevilla