Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofia
Defining constructivism.
This exhibition focuses on Aleksandr Rodchenko and Liubov Popova’s work from
1917 to 1925. In this period of upheaval lasting less than a decade, Russia moved
from the urgency of the revolution to the establishment of the Soviet state, from
pure pictorial abstraction to the definition of Constructivism. More than a
movement, the latter was an artistic ideology applicable to many types of
creation, including graphic and industrial design, sculpture, painting, film and
theater, among others.
The October Revolution marks the moment when the emerging power of the
Soviets transformed artistic debate into a complex reflection on working
conditions, the nature of production and the elements involved in construction (of
an object, a society, the “new citizen,” men and women). In this new model of
society with universalist aspirations, the arts were not a peripheral element; they
played a central role in its ideological, political, economic and philosophical
debates.
There are two key historical moments in the definition of Constructivism as an
artistic movement: 1917, when the Bolshevik revolution began; and 1925, when the
International Exhibition of Modern Decorative and Industrial Arts was presented in
Paris, just a year after Lenin’s death. While the first event was a major catalyst for
experimentation, the second marked the international consolidation and
popularity of many of the ideas developed by Rodchenko and Popova. But it also
marked the movement’s demise, paralleling the end of the revolutionary process
and the beginning of the oppressive Stalinist regime.
Bolshevik ideology implied the elimination of the Bourgeois way of life in all its
manifestations, and so, Constructivism was born of destruction—the death of easel
painting. The clearest expression of this purge is Rodchenko’s 1921 triptych, Pure
Red Color, Pure Yellow Color, Pure Blue Color, a definitive tabula rasa that
determined the end of a world, beginning with the disappearance of the two-
dimensional elements that had represented it. This gesture was radically
iconoclastic in a time and place where the religious icon was a sign of identity. As
Popova put it: “representation resulting from artistic production is an objective that
has met practical needs from the Renaissance until very recently (easel panting,
icons, frescos, the sculptures located in public places, courts and palaces,
architecture as a visual object, and so on).”
In its rejection of any form of illusionist representation, Constructivism’s earliest
period was characterized by extremely hermetic abstraction driven by an interest
in texture, the psychological effects of color, and geometry in movement. This first
period is exemplified by both Rodchenko’s Black on Black (1918) series, in which
color is eliminated in order to focus attention on the pure pictorial surface; and
Popova’s geometric figures in movement, which are intensely colored and
constructivist in their inclinations. Both series owe much to the radicality of
Suprematism—embodied by Malevitch, who first brought the avant-garde to
Russia—and the dense theorizing of Kandinsky, who set the bases for European
abstraction before being called to join the first Bolshevik artistic bureaucracy.
The maxim, “only paint exists,” that underlies these early artworks would soon be
contradicted by the interdisciplinary tendencies that characterized the
movement. Graphic works allowed it to reach a broader public and also to
distance itself from the idea of the artwork as unique and irreproducible. From the
first drawings and engravings we can already see the application of constructivist
principles to disciplines such as architecture and industrial design.
The 1920s began with the presentation of the INKhUK, an institution dedicated to
thinking and dialog about artistic creation where the theoretical underpinnings of
Constructivism emerged: on one hand, the socialist concept of participation in
production, and on the other, the resolution of the “composition/construction”
debate in favor of the latter. Unlike Expressionism and early Central-European
Lyrical Abstraction, which promoted the idea of pictorial space as individual
expression, Constructivism activated a series of political strategies to change the
new human being’s mental and material structures.
That is when Rodchenko
reduced his work to its essence, with the line as its main element, a more limited
palette and the use of new supports, including sheet metal and cardboard.
The impact of the 5 x 5 = 25 exhibition, which many consider “the last exhibition,”
marked the beginning of new creative applications of what had been learned in
the limited terrain of two-dimensional art.
Traditional painting was abandoned in
favor of formats more closely associated with the idea of the project, such as
drawings and models. Sculpture had already been rejected in its classical
conception, freed of its physical limits and distanced from its traditional “archaic”
and commemorative associations. In the search for new space, the floor and walls
stopped being limits or supports for three-dimensional pieces. They were now hung
from the ceiling, including Popova’s Dynamic-Spatial Constructions (1920-1921)
and Constructions in Space (1920-1921).
In 1921, Constructivism became the corporate image of Lenin’s New Economic
Policy through Rodchenko and Popova’s publicity, propaganda and educational
works (mainly posters and textiles). There, the ideological message is marked by
pure geometry, flat colors and unadorned lettering—forceful elements of, and for,
immediate communication that have left an indelible mark on the history of
design and publicity.
As it entered the field of design, art served productivity, becoming a project and
establishing a definitive relation with industry as the best expression of the new
human being. In keeping with the slogan, “new everyday life,” the public space
was flooded with posters that Rodchenko created in collaboration with the poet,
Maiakovsky, while industrial and interior design promoted surroundings steeped in
ideology—visual representations of dialectical materialism. In that sense, The
International Exhibition of Modern Decorative and Industrial Arts held in Paris in
1925 included a mock-up of the Workers’ Club project, the final application of
many of the disciplines with which Rodchenko and Popova had been working for
nearly ten years.
The Club was presented as the perfect setting for workers whose
leisure time would be characterized by a process of political awakening, a place
far-removed from former bourgeois comforts and designed to contain study
materials on Lenin for projections and presentations. There was to be only one
concession to recreation: a chessboard. This space intended for socialist immersion
led to the far-reaching propagation of Constructivism’s formal values on an
international scale just when it was disappearing from its native land with the
dawn of Socialist Realism.
Finally, that interest in the new art’s presence in all aspects of proletarian life found
radical expression in Rodchenko’s collaborative works for theater and film,
especially after Popova’s death in 1924. Rodchenko’s collaborations as artistic
director and designer with Lev Kuleshov and Dziga Vertov allowed him to
approach a quintessentially reproducible and applied art for the masses with
immediate ideological effects. In that sense, Vertov wanted his 1922 film, Kino-
Pravda, for which Rodchenko designed the credits, to be projected in streets and
factories, rather than in cramped movie houses.
Rodchenko’s ideas for interior
design were spread by Kuleshov’s 1927 film, The Journalist, while Boris Barnet’s
Moscow in October, also from 1927, embodied the application of his vast
knowledge of photography to moving pictures. Filmmaking exemplified the idea
of participative production (it is collective work by definition) while simultaneously
allowing the development and exploration of concepts in a visual setting not
limited by the edges of a canvas or the walls of a gallery.
Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía
Sabatini Building. 1st floor
Santa Isabel, 52 Madrid
Hours:
Monday to Saturday: 10:00 – 21:00 h
Sundays: 10:00 – 14:30 h
Tuesdays Closed