Gao Mingyan
Jia Aili
Jin Shan
Jin Shi
Ho Elaine W.
Hu Xiangqian
Hu Xiaoyuan
Li Jinghu
Li Naihan
Li Ming
Li Mu
Liang Shuo
Qiu Xiaofei
Sun Xun
Wang Wei
Yan Jun
Yang Xinguang
Zhang Enli
Zhao Yao
Zhou Yilun
Beatrice Leanza
Started in November 2010, the project The Third Party designed itself as a three-part script to be staged monthly in individual yet interconnected exhibitions that took 'the relationship between narrative and aesthetic objects' as their field of investigation. Like the first and second chapters, respectively tackling issues of 'self-historicization' and 'witnessing/archiving', the third and last instalment of the show engages, in 'appropriating' fashion, the discursive shifts of 'collaboration'.
An artist intent on casting off all restrictive conditions can only do so after he has
clarified the relationship among artistic activity, artwork, and the public. [...] The key
isn’t to alter one’s language or the public’s involvement, but rather to change the
artistic relationship between viewing and being viewed.”
Zhang Peili - The Point of Departure for Art Project no.2, 1988
An exhibition in Three Acts featuring:
1. How to Be Alone (or Nowhere else am I safe from the question: why here?) | Nov.11 – Nov. 30, 2010
2. The Stranger | Dec. 9 – Dec. 27, 2010
3. The Third Party | Jan. 9 – Jan. 24, 2011
Curated by Beatrice Leanza
Participants:
8633 Link (Beijing), Arrow Factory (Beijing), Arthub Asia (Davide Quadrio,
Bangkok; Defne Ayas, Shanghai), BAO Atelier (Beatrice Leanza/Li Naihan; Beijing),
CAEP - Complete Art Experience Project (Beijing), ChART Contemporary/Open
House (Cassandra and Megan Connolly; Beijing), Comfortable Collective (Shanghai),
Chen Zhou/Li Ming/Li Ran/Yan Xing (Company; Hangzhou/Beijing), DDM
Warehouse (Zheng Weimin; Shanghai), Donkey Institute of Contemporary Art
(Michael Yuan/Yam Lau; Beijing), Double Fly Art Centre (Hangzhou/Shanghai),
Everyone’s East Lake Art Project (Li Juchuan; Wuhan), Falling Behind group
(Beijing); Forget Art Art Collective (Beijing), Knowles Eddy Knowles group
(Beijing), Homeshop (Elaine W. Ho; Beijing), Jin Shan, Little Movements Project (Liu
Ding, Carol Yinghua Lu; Beijing), Libreria Borges (Chen Tong; Guangzhou), Peter
Zhang/Su Chang for Mommy Foundation (Biljana Ciric; Shanghai/Beijing),
Observation Society (Guangzhou), Shan Studio (Sheng Jie aka GogoJ; Beijing),
Subjam (Yan Jun; Beijing).
Started in November 2010, the project The Third Party designed itself as a three-
part script to be staged monthly in individual yet interconnected exhibitions that
took 'the relationship between narrative and aesthetic objects’ as their field of
investigation.
Since the outset, these three instantiations have been envisioned as 'points of
departure, flexible and open-ended’ frames of reference and critique operating in
the Chinese contexts through which visual experience and conceptual structures
could find alternative avenues of articulation.
Like the first and second chapters, respectively tackling issues of 'self-
historicization’ and 'witnessing/archiving’, the third and last instalment of the show engages, in 'appropriating’ fashion, the discursive shifts of 'collaboration’. These
three topics are product of a deliberate curatorial choice aimed at gridding out both
temporal and material correspondences to the larger arena of the 'contemporary’
intended as a wide-ranging archive of historical and aesthetic ambivalences. As
circuits of signification trafficking between work and world, the individual and the
collective, and therefore between artist and public, they configure culturally specific
products of both subjective narration and collective constitution.
Appropriation runs through the course of Chinese contemporary art history as an
unstable and at times unattainable paradigm – doomed undialectical, it stands at
the crossroads of the seemingly irreconcilable times and places of an 'incomplete’,
other-than-Western modern project, vacated of any deconstructive and critical
potential.
Out of all its uses, which, stylistic or systemic, art historians and critics have often
employed to substantiate their socio-political commentaries and localized forms of
historicism over the past three decades, this project chooses to treat appropriation as a positive tension by means of which given conceptual images and
interpretations can be infused, as they should, with contextually specific meanings.
The last instalment of The Third Party is dubbed “The Third Party – A Group
Celebration!”.
The two hyphenated parts of the title intend to heighten the inherent circularity
proper of the progressive movement of the overall project. Unlike a literary
composition plotted on exclusionary sequences of cause and effect, The Third Party
plays with strategies of association, the tracing of patterns of presence and absence
that both distance and engage themselves. Not a coda nor a gran finale, this last
enactment does not represent a moment of synthesis nor of disruption of former
orders; on the contrary it moves further into another, alternative perceptual
context that both contains and expands the scope of preceding ones. As a total
project The Third Party is certainly a group show, one that alludes, knowingly, to its
inevitable partiality and limitation as such.
The critical extensions of the dimension of 'collaboration’ span over a century-long
history of theoretical and practical forays bridging the artistic and the social sphere.
Particularly in a Western historical lineage of interpretation, collaboration is
associated with a variety of positions and experiences which, by way of a
generalization, have strived to collapse the divide between artist and audience,
authorship and spectatorship, by coming inscribed in a realm of agency intrinsically political and oppositional in nature.
Threaded through the genealogy of so called socially-engaged, relational practices,
the deconstructive expanse of collaborative ventures in art making embraces
creation as a dialogical process or oblique positioning engendering alternative
forms of consensus building, promoting a participative and active pronunciation of will and independent thinking capable to bend the existing relations of power and production policing specific social constituencies. Likewise in the history of
Chinese art the subversive force of collaboration recurs as both subject and object
of artistic and intellectual pursuits reacting to the contextual conditions or
limitations defined by overarching socio-political institutions found inadequate or
simply unresponsive.
It is worth noting that under the widespread economic uncertainties traversing the
global domain of art over the past two years, the sobering effect landed onto the
extravagance of market-oriented productions feeding the concentric ranks of 'inner
circles’, has unleashed the jubilation of artists and critics celebrating a return to
'content-and-quality’-driven systems, long co-opted by the distracting lures of
commercial viability and individual success. The empowering drive of collaboration
and communal projects more than ever becomes a cipher for modest but necessary
offerings calling upon new conceptual and practical undertakings to enact truer
dialogues about the dissipation of both material and ephemeral values we once hold
in common and facts have proven we have failed. A return to the ordinary, gestational rhymes of the everyday.
China has certainly been no exception. Yet again in the game of appropriations,
paradigms reappear inadequate and futile.
This exhibition is therefore not an all-encompassing effort aimed at filling the
blanks of Chinese art glossary under the category of 'collaborative’ or practices - an exercise that would first require framing an understanding of the
spatial and aesthetic conventions informing the workings of their official
counterparts (which there could be no space here for).
Conversely “The Third Party – A Group Celebration!” rounds up this research
process in the realm of the ordinary by transforming the exhibition in a
spontaneous theatre of self‐representation, an informal assemblage of current
experiments in collaborative practices from China.
An exhibition, an archive, an experiment in participation itself, the show takes the
shape of a living archive by making use of The Beehive system units, which are here
employed both as a supporting structure and a tool for artists’ interventions.
China-based self-organized/independent art spaces, artistic collectives, loose
groups, specific project teams and artists founding their practice on collaborative
actions have been invited to submit proposals or materials that are explanatory of
their work, the type of activity they do in their specific context, and what is the way
they realize it as 'someone who works with others’. The exhibition is not simply a
display of independent ventures, shows or projects previously realized, but an open
tableau where each group partakes in a process of positive and proactive
communication of concepts and ideas that stand behind the works as products
of/for collective creation. This last chapter features newly created works and
archival documentation provided by the participants along live performances, site-
specific installations, sounds and pieces produced over the course of two months.
Some of the projects are the result of impromptu collaborations emplaced to
support peers not based in Beijing, others are specifically created to respond to the
call of the exhibition itself.
Various balancing forces motivate the practices here presented, arguably no less
politically or controversially responsive to the established systems that cannot or
will not accommodate them, than its historical precursors. Challenging social or
aesthetic conventions and operating on varying degrees of specificity to the sites
and constituencies they are inscribed in, they compose a picture where the
individual limits of conceptual and material resources are overcome by means of a
supplementary, collective strategy through which a 'perceived lack or
inconsistency’ comes to be lived rather than resolved.
“Now has come the time for settling debts left over from the historical past. Art is, first
and foremost, the artist. And, it is up to the artists to seize back the authority that they
surrendered.”
(Zhang Peili, 1988)
Organized by Platform China in collaboration with BAO Atelier
For Inquiries please contact:
Claudia Albertini claudia@platformchina.org
Opening: Sunday - Jan. 9, 2011 | 3 – 7 pm
Platform China Contemporary Art Institute
Add: East End Art Zone A, No. 319-1
Caochangdi Village, Chaoyang District, 100015 Beijing