The show features examples of the most important forms, structures and methods of opinion control - the same methods which, hand in hand with the further development of the modern mass media, are encountered in our own time in ever new and ever more subtle forms in the context of conflicts and military disputes: posters, films, sculptures, photographs, illustrated magazines and objects of everyday life such as children's toys or patriotic emblems.
World War I is considered the first global mass-media event of modern times. When it started in August 1914,
presumably no one anticipated that the horrific combat operations would drag on for four years and cost more than
seventeen million lives. Regarded at the time as a “new weapon” in warfare, the propaganda efforts of the participating
nations are today thought to be one cause of the war’s unexpected duration and intensity. Against the background of the
research into mass psychology taking place at the same time, they exploited the arsenal of the mass media and tested
innovative propaganda strategies in the battle for public attention at home and abroad. The masses were considered
uncritical, impulsive and impressionable by the political leaders. With tales of atrocities and heroism and the constant
repetition of key messages, the opinion makers endeavoured to generate effective images and create a bellicose mood. In
Germany the war was presented as the “seminal catastrophe”, for the French it was the “great war”, and for the Poles the
“national liberation”. A hundred years after the outbreak of World War I, with an exhibition entitled “War and
Propaganda 14/18”, the Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Hamburg (MKG) is providing insight into the broad spectrum
of mass manipulation carried out during the period in question. The show features examples of the most important
forms, structures and methods of opinion control – the same methods which, hand in hand with the further development
of the modern mass media, are encountered in our own time in ever new and ever more subtle forms in the context of
conflicts and military disputes. More than four hundred objects from the German Reich, France, England, the U.S.,
Russia, Italy and Austro-Hungary are on view in the show. The exhibition shows posters, films, sculptures, photographs,
illustrated magazines and objects of everyday life such as children’s toys or patriotic emblems. Historical audio
recordings and music from the period of the First World War as well as graphic work by artists and postcards are further
important aspects of the exhibition.
Mobilization: At the beginning of the war, the German Reich as well as the countries of the Central Powers’ enemies –
Great Britain, France and Russia – pursued a strategy of euphorization that relied strongly on music as a vehicle of
national pride and optimistic confidence in victory. The voices expressing criticism of the unfolding events were drowned
out. Loyalty to the authorities and feelings of honour and solidarity merged with political and economic interests: an
entire industry sprouted up around the publication of printed matter related to the war. In 1914, the recruitment
campaigns in England (where compulsory military service was not introduced until 1916) deliberately and successfully
employed the new medium of film along with already well-known advertising media such as the poster. Within a good
twelve months, more than 12.5 million posters were printed from 164 designs. The arguments ranged from participation
in a great sporting adventure to the threat of losing face in the eyes of wives, friends and family. The professional work of
the War Propaganda Bureau in London made itself felt in the far corners of the Empire; the European conflict became a
world war.
Demonization: The hate propaganda of the Entente, in particular Great Britain, France and Russia, was based on
extremely simple pictorial formulae and their continuous repetition. Far from weighing the pros and cons of different
viewpoints, it pursued its aims with the aid of suggestive slogans, stereotypes and emotional persuasion. The German
enemy was typified as bloodthirsty, ruthless, and bestial. Whenever the events of the war permitted such an
interpretation, particularly the British and French propaganda institutions seized the opportunity to produce a new
variation on the Hun topos. Dissociation from the enemy was intended as a means of strengthening people’s
identification with their own nation and their allies. With regular reminders of actual or fictitious acts of German military
violence in Belgium, for example, this demonization fuelled fear of a German invasion. Propaganda systematically
polarized opposing parties; the war was presented as a moral necessity requiring the unconditional support of every
individual. The German side also subscribed to the strategy of producing images designed to demonize its enemies, but
without comparable success.
Participation: Whether at public mass gatherings or in the privacy of one’s home, the war found its way into the very
midst of people’s everyday lives. Solemnly celebrated collective events relied on participation to strengthen the
community and its endorsement of the war on the home front, and to raise funds to finance military operations and war
relief. Urgent appeals were made to the population to join in the effort. Nor did the nationalist propaganda stop at the
doors of nurseries. Militaristic toys and patriotic children’s books also made light of the war and reproduced the enemy
stereotypes of the adult world. Publicly circulating propagandistic statements thus permeated the private family sphere
and militarized the everyday lives of all generations. Even without a specific government order, elaborately staged
campaigns and widely diverse media served to spread attitudes such as patriotism and animosity.
Authenticity – Images of War: Real-life action in the war zone took place remote from the daily lives of the folks back
home. All the greater was the longing of the latter for authentic pictures from the front. Illustrated weeklies catered to
this tremendous demand. The reports they featured were dominated by drawings and photographs. Official war painters
and specially commissioned draughtsmen and photographers recorded the activities on the basis of first-hand experience
or second-hand descriptions. The picture captions supplied the patriotic tone and often distorted the facts, irreversibly
robbing the war images of their credibility and verisimilitude. Some one hundred professional press photographers and
countless private photojournalists travelled the fronts. Their pictures, however, which appeared in illustrated magazines,
were subject to the state censorship.
Film Propaganda: At the outbreak of war, the film medium had not even reached the age of twenty. Nevertheless, cinema
was already a mass cultural phenomenon and accordingly employed as an innovative propaganda medium. Films of the
time were silent, but usually screened with musical accompaniment. Linguistic elements were conveyed by intertitles that
often contribute decisively to the cohesiveness of the filmic narrative. Cinema served as an agent of patriotic experience
and a source of information and entertainment in one. From the fictitious feature film to documentary and promotional
productions, a wide range of film genres competed for the interpretational sovereignty of the moving picture and the
manipulation of the mass public.
Advertising Campaigns: The simplest and most inexpensive means of conveying propaganda messages to the public was
the poster. From the modest notice to the more sophisticated text poster to highly inventive image propaganda, in World
War I the poster came to be one of the very most important mass media. It had its origins in the advertising sector, and in
all of the warring states it was accordingly advertising artists who took the lead in the novel employment of the poster for
political purposes. State propaganda advertised war bonds, called for the population’s collective self-denial in view of the
shortage economy, and urged people to send “Liebesgaben” (“gifts of love”) – parcels from home intended to strengthen
morale at the front. Until about 1916, however, the commercial character of the war posters was criticized by the majority
of the population as inappropriate. The perception of the poster changed in the course of the war years; the public
underwent a process of inurement, and people’s reservations dwindled. The mass-scale advertisement of war bonds
became all the more aggressive as a result, and from 1917 onward, all of the warring countries worked with the strategy of
emotionalizing the public.
The most important advertising medium was the poster, which very successfully called upon the members of the
population to contribute their personal assets. The Central Powers, consisting first and foremost of the allied German
Reich and Austro-Hungary, adhered to the practice of regular war bond campaigns in the autumn and spring. The
Entente Powers, for their part, carried out their campaigns as necessitated by the course of the war events and the
ensuing financial requirements. Following the military defeat, the money that had been invested in Germany and Austria
was lost. Propaganda thus ultimately contributed to the obliteration of major assets.
Human beings proved to be particularly effective propaganda instruments. Above all in the U.S., Hollywood movie stars
served to spread official opinions. Directly after the USA entered the war, numerous famous people like Charles Chaplin,
Douglas Fairbanks and Mary Pickford put themselves at the service of the patriotic cause, advertising the Liberty Bonds
or calling on men to enlist. In an age without radio, public speeches were an especially effective way of addressing the
masses. In order to generate a positive attitude towards the controversial entry into the war, the American Committee on
Public Information (CPI) created the Four Minute Men, a nationwide network of volunteer propaganda speakers. By the
end of the war, more than 75,000 men and women had held more than 800,000 speeches, and are believed to have
reached around 400 million people at cinemas, theatres and public rallies.
Memento: In the spring of 2014, the Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Hamburg and the Hamburger Abendblatt jointly
asked the Hamburg public for personal keepsakes of World War I. The objects placed at the museum’s disposal, many of
which belonged to family members who never returned from the war, are personal voices which break through the
anonymous drone of the propaganda. At the same time, state opinion control in the form of morale-boosting slogans,
heroic images and idealized newspaper headlines are found even in private photo albums and everyday objects. This
ambiguity is also reflected by letters from the front sent by former MKG employees, or in private pictures of the front by
the draughtsman Friedrich Elling. The line between authentic memory and propaganda commonplaces is hazy.
Lenders: Schloßparkmuseum, Bad Kreuznach | Bundesarchiv-Filmarchiv, Berlin | Stiftung Deutsche Kinemathek, Berlin
| Museum Europäischer Kulturen – Staatliche Museen zu Berlin | Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin – Preußischer Kulturbesitz |
Stiftung Deutsches Historisches Museum, Berlin | Stiftung Deutsches Technikmuseum Berlin | Stiftung Stadtmuseum
Berlin | Archiv der sozialen Demokratie der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Bonn | Militärhistorisches Museum der
Bundeswehr, Dresden | Marinekommando, 1. U-Bootgeschwader, Eckernförde | La Camera Stylo Film Collection GmbH,
Hamburg | Elke Dröscher, Hamburg | Internationales Maritimes Museum Hamburg | Staats- und Universitäts-
bibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky | Stiftung Historische Museen Hamburg – Altonaer Museum | Stiftung
Historische Museen Hamburg – Hamburg Museum | Jürgen Hach, Kiel-Schulensee | Deutsche Nationalbibliothek,
Leipzig | British Film Institute, London | Imperial War Museums, London | Victoria and Albert Museum, London |
Filmoteca Española, Madrid | Staatliche Schlösser und Gärten Baden-Württemberg, Reiss-Engelhorn-Museen,
Mannheim | Dithmarscher Landesmuseum, Meldorf | Münchner Stadtmuseum | Spielzeugmuseum Nürnberg | Gaumont
Pathé, Paris | Lobster Films, Paris | Roy Export S.A.S., Paris | Bibliothek für Zeitgeschichte, Württembergische
Landesbibliothek Stuttgart | AG Loiperdinger + Pinschewer, Trier | Deutsches Harmonikamuseum, Trossingen | Library
of Congress, Washington D. C. | Friedrich-Wilhelm-Murnau-Stiftung, Wiesbaden | and two private collectors
Catalogue: A catalogue has been published in conjunction with the show, edited by Sabine Schulze, Leonie Beiersdorf and
Dennis Conrad, with texts by Leonie Beiersdorf, Frank Böhme, Dennis Conrad, Simon Klingler, Philip Rosin, Maryam
Schnepper, Friederike Schütt, Sabine Schulze, approx. 224 pages, approx. 180 colour illustrations, 20 × 28 cm, bound, 25 €.
The exhibition is being made possible with funds from the Department of Culture and the IT-Globalfonds of the Freie
und Hansestadt Hamburg, the Hubertus Wald Stiftung and the Justus Brinckmann Gesellschaft.
Image: Unknown artist, Charlie Chaplin auf einer Kriegskundgebung in New York, 1918, Photography, Otto Bettmann Archive/FPF, Pennsylvania
Curator: Dennis Conrad, T. 040 428134-101, E-Mail: dennis.conrad@mkg-hamburg.de
Press contacts: Michaela Hille, T. 040 428134-800, F. 040-428134-999, E-Mail: presse@mkg-hamburg.de
Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Hamburg
Steintorplatz | D-20099 Hamburg
Opening times: Tues –Sun 10 am – 6 pm, Thurs 10 am– 9 pm
Entrance: 10 € / 7 €, Thurs after 5 pm 7 €, up to age 17 free